You feel that you have a right to copy the designs of others, and that because there is a demand in the marketplace, you have a right to fulfill it. You are free to do so, and if you did so responsibly, there would be no problem. You steal their branding, their designs, IP, and advertising. You do everything you can to look like a legitimate LEGO product. Your customers see this as a good thing.

That difference in cost is facilitated by your moral bankruptcy. Of course you can provide a cheaper version when you pay not for the licensing, design, branding, marketing, nor research. I agree that aftermarket prices for retired LEGO sets are more often than not completely ridiculous.

That is the fault of opportunists, not so different from yourself, preying on those who were unable to purchase a set when it was available. I also understand that there is still a demand for these sets.

The LEGO Group has no responsibility to keep sets in production in perpetuity, or to re-release old sets. Would it be great if they did? Are they obligated to, simply to satisfy rabid consumerism? Absolutely not. I was disgusted. How could someone even consider doing such a thing? My heart dropped into my stomach.

There I was, looking at a build I had spent over a month on, being produced by a bootleg toy company. Someone else had taken my design, without my permission, and is selling it for a profit.

Udeler software for windows

You did that. It hurts the building community as a whole. There are so many amazing builders out there. There are so many people out there creating beautiful, inventive, funny, and surprising things.

I even met the love of my life through this hobby. All of those opportunities only existed because there is a vibrant community of people sharing their work with each other. People will cease to be inspired by one another. An incredible community would be destroyed.This resulted in an injunction prohibiting the production, sale or promotion of the infringing sets, and a damage award of RMB 4.

LEPIN ENDGAME : Police Raid on Lepin's Factory & Warehouse

While this decision is hailed as a win for LEGO, and a blow in favour of IP rights enforcement in China, the commercial reality is that 18 sets is a drop in the proverbial ocean of counterfeits for LEGO. A quick spin around the Lepin website shows that there is a sprawling product line available to the marketplace, most of which are direct copies of the corresponding LEGO sets.

These are copies in appearance at least, since the quality of the Lepin product is … different, when compared to the quality of LEGO branded merchandise, according to some online reviews. The connectable plastic brick which was popularized by LEGO is not, in itself, protectable from the IP perspective patents expired long ago, and the trademarks in the brick shape were struck down in Canada.

While the bricks are just bricks, the LEGO trademarks are protectable, and as LEGO established, so are the rights in three-dimensional set designs, packaging art and other elements that were shamelessly copied by the busy folks at Lepin. Protection of market share is a complex undertaking, where an intellectual property strategy is one element. JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy. Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the " My Account " dashboard available if you are logged into your JD Supra account. Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account " Registration Data "such as your:.

Other Information : We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services such as contacting an author through our Website or communications directly with us such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media. If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties such as, from your employer or LinkedIn : We may also receive information about you from third party sources.

For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile. Your interactions with our Website and Services : As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically.

Medlab inc

We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles.

Lepin Bricks Sets Official Store

Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information.

To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our " Cookies Guide " page. We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:.

is lepin still in business

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff.

Zene za udaju

Where you use log-in credentials usernames, passwords on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy jdsupra. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites.

We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies.Such hilarity With Transformers, you have 3rd party companies making high quality figures that are quite welcomed by the community, and other fans have cheap dollar store knockoff collections for shits and giggles. On a forum I often visit, they have an entire thread dedicated to posting bootleg finds.

With Marvel Legends, a bootleg figure is sometime the only way for a collector on a budget to get a normally ultra rare figure.

People will share their findings to help out other collectors. It is not frowned upon. And then you have rabid Lego fans. Don't you even mention a chinese brand to them or you will get lynched, it's insane.

How to remove file path in excel when printing

Once, I wanted to talk about clone bricks like Enlighten's all original Legendary Pirate series - so not even close to any straight up ripoffs of Lego kits - but not even that was tolerated. They have a stick so far up their ass, it's ridiculous. I have no clue why that is either Anytime you get those fanatical hater responses, you just have to wonder whether all their marbles are intact.

Geez, their just toys! My neighbor bought some of those fake bricks. When my kids came home from their house after being invited over to play, their hands were oily and smelled funny.

They said they played with LEGO the whole time they were over there. They aren't allowed to play with those kids anymore. Email This BlogThis! Labels: lepin bricksnet worth of lego.

Unknown May 1, at PM. Xinh Lepin May 3, at PM. Ed Mack July 15, at AM. Anonymous July 15, at AM. Newer Post Older Post Home. Subscribe to: Post Comments Atom.The four companies, including Shantou Meizhi Model Co. The ruling is another significant legal victory for LEGO as the company continues to battle imitators in China.

The rulings also provide precedent to continue pursuing many other clone brands who have tried shutting down and reopening with different names to avoid enforcement.

How far does this go?? For instance, is the brick concept itself a LEGO registered product? What if the designs are originally those of these Chinese brands? What if I choose to make and sell sets of my own designs? Congratulations to the LEGO group. And good news for all of us. Holy Hell! I had just assumed there was nothing that could be done about them.

As everyone understands — nothing will change. Derrick — the patent on the brick itself expired some years ago, so anyone can produce a building brick toy. The issue with these copy-cat products is that they rip off all the hard work and design that the real Lego designers do. I bought a few mini-figs of theirs to see…I figured they were making them in LEGO shops in China because they are spot on.

Like this article? Tell all your friends! Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.Gabriela Saldivia. The toy company Lepin was raided by Chinese authorities in Shenzhen, China last week for allegedly manufacturing fake Lego products. A quick google search and it's pretty clear, the toys from the Chinese company Lepin are eerily similar to another very popular toy on the market: Legos.

The company's website has been taken down after authorities raided its factory located in Shenzhen, China last week after discovering it was allegedly manufacturing fake Lego products. Most Lepin sets, including the Star Wars series, are advertised on many websites that claim to sell the products as "compatible with Lego. And now we know why. Police said in a statement that the toys were copied from Lego blueprints and more thanfinished products were seized from the factory, the BBC reported.

A police investigation is still underway. According to the BBC, images posted by Chinese authorities after the raid showed products that looked nearly identical to those produced by the Danish toy giant, Lego.

The Lepin brand is definitely a cheaper option, often selling for a fraction of the price of Legos. Zhong Shikai, one of the police officers responsible for investigating the case, told the state-run news agency Xinhua that there are big differences in the craftsmanship and quality when comparing the two.

Lego China and Asia Pacific's vice president Robin Smith said the products could pose a safety concern for consumers, Xinhua reported. Foreign companies in China have long expressed dissatisfaction about intellectual property enforcement because of the prevalence of counterfeiting. The AFP reports the raid was a move by China to double down on intellectual property infringements, possibly in an attempt to ease trade tensions with Washington.

Xinhua reported that the number of intellectual property rights trials in Shanghai hit a record high last year. This story was updated to remove a link to a reseller of Lepin products, after readers wrote to let us know it was not the company's official website.

is lepin still in business

Accessibility links Skip to main content Keyboard shortcuts for audio player. NPR Shop. Facebook Twitter Flipboard Email.

LEPIN ordered to stop making and selling LEGO imitation products by Chinese court [News]

April 27, PM ET. Enlarge this image. Editor's Note May 16, This story was updated to remove a link to a reseller of Lepin products, after readers wrote to let us know it was not the company's official website.In general, and thanks to patent expiry, most LEGO-compatible clone products are perfectly legal and, in many cases, fine products in their own right. Then you have something like this. From the packaging to the actual sets, this company blatantly steals from LEGO in an attempt to dupe unwitting people into thinking they are getting the real deal at a very low price.

Most of the time the box art on the set is just plain stolen from the LEGO side. There are reports of shoddy quality control, missing pieces, and so on, but not enough to dissuade the average buyer. The simple answer is that Lepin does not have to pay for things such as design, marketing, or any of the other things that LEGO has had to invest in to bring us their product.

One of the main costs is licensing fees. Companies like Disney take a significant chunk of each sale. The problem is that companies based in China and other parts of the Far East have been notoriously difficult to challenge on IP grounds.

Lepin Bricks Sets Official Store

That means that we as LEGO fans are the only ones who really have any sway here. The only way to get Lepin to change its ways and go ahead on its own steam is to stop buying its products.

The main draw of Lepin sets is the fact that they replicate real LEGO sets, piggybacking on the hype that already exists. Do you want to display a Lepin set? Can you even resell it? In the end, this is a choice that every LEGO fan has to make. Most of what Lepin does is not actually illegal, and I really believe that the company can redeem itself and become a preferred supplier of LEGO-compatible products.

We as fans just need to help them get there with a friendly nudge. A Cautionary Tale. Why are Lepin Sets so Cheap? Share This Article! Choose Your Platform. Related Posts.Following the court case against LEPIN in Novemberthe Chinese counterfeiters are back in the news again and, this time, the police are involved.

This included more thanfinished sets,boxes,instruction leaflets and manuals, and over 90 production molds. You can listen to the interview here starts at Maybe if Lego actually priced their items reasonably, no-one would need to buy counterfeit blocks.

They were handy for the out of production stuff. Maybe the Chinese think they better make a little effort, a little good faith effort, and what better way to clamp down on an IP abuser of a beloved company.

China wins, the fans win, and LEGO wins. Of course no one would give Trump credit. Not even me. But it is interesting to think about. I agree with mm — Lepin were really useful when you wanted earlier out of production sets like the Technic AROCS truck but I do always try to buy official Lego first or else build it with orders from BrickLink if I have some or most of the parts already.

Glad to see it. Rich white liberals can pat themselves on the back because LEGO can afford to pay their workers even less money now that government has used our tax dollars to shut down their only competition. Destroy it all. Screw global warming.

is lepin still in business

Most of the bricks are still manufactured in Billund, with a variety of special parts outsourced to place like China due to the cheapness of retooling machinery to special uses. Also, Denmark has extraordinarily worker-friendly laws and culture.

Killing Lepin would only hurt workers if the company was based in the US, where that sort of thing happens. Like this article? Tell all your friends! Post was not sent - check your email addresses!

is lepin still in business


Warning: printf(): Too few arguments in E:\PANDORASTATEINIY\Plugins\TemplateConvertorHost\htdocs\wordpress\wp-content\themes\travel-master\comments.php on line 47

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *